Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy versus Videolaryngoscopy with the GlideScope^®: A Neonatal Manikin Study with Inexperienced Intubators

ABSTRACT

We hypothesized that because the view of the glottis is better with videolaryngoscopes, successful intubation in neonates would be accomplished in a shorter time with the GlideScope^® (Verathon, Inc., Bothell, WA) videolaryngoscope (GVL). Forty-five students of the University of Athens, inexperienced in both techniques, participated in the study (21 medical students and 24 nursing students, crossover randomized study). Following a brief educational session, each participant practiced and attempted intubation on a neonatal manikin using conventional laryngoscope and GVL, as many times as required to secure the airway. The time required to successful intubation and the number of attempts with each device were recorded. No significant difference was observed between the number of attempts required for successful intubation with either laryngoscope. The time required for the first successful intubation with the conventional laryngoscope was significantly shorter compared with that required with the GVL (p = 0.0013). There was no difference regarding the time required for the successful intubation between medical and nursing students, using the conventional laryngoscope or the GVL. The number of attempts to successful intubation with either device did not differ. The time required for intubation with the GVL was longer, and this is probably due to a design flaw.

KEYWORDS

Videolaryngoscopy - conventional laryngoscopy - neonates - manikin

REFERENCES

• 1 Winchell R J, Hoyt D B. Trauma Research and Education Foundation of San Diego . Endotracheal intubation in the field improves survival in patients with severe head injury.  Arch Surg. 1997;  132 592-597
• 2 Gerbeaux P. Should emergency medical service rescuers be trained to practice endotracheal intubation?.  Crit Care Med. 2005;  33 1864-1865
• 3 Wang H E, Seitz S R, Hostler D, Yealy D M. Defining the learning curve for paramedic student endotracheal intubation.  Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005;  9 156-162
• 4 Mulcaster J T, Mills J, Hung O R et al.. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance.  Anesthesiology. 2003;  98 23-27
• 5 Shippey B, Ray D, McKeown D. Case series: the McGrath videolaryngoscope—an initial clinical evaluation.  Can J Anaesth. 2007;  54 307-313
• 6 Asai T, Murao K, Shingu K. Training method of applying pressure on the neck for laryngoscopy: use of a videolaryngoscope.  Anaesthesia. 2003;  58 602-603
• 7 Sun D A, Warriner C B, Parsons D G, Klein R, Umedaly H S, Moult M. The GlideScope Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients.  Br J Anaesth. 2005;  94 381-384
• 8 Cuchillo J V, Rodríguez M A. Considerations aimed at facilitating the use of the new GlideScope videolaryngoscope.  Can J Anaesth. 2005;  52 661 author reply 661-662
• 9 Rai M R, Dering A, Verghese C. The Glidescope system: a clinical assessment of performance.  Anaesthesia. 2005;  60 60-64
• 10 Cooper R M, Pacey J A, Bishop M J, McCluskey S A. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients.  Can J Anaesth. 2005;  52 191-198
• 11 Lim Y, Lim T J, Liu E H. Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by inexperienced operators in simulated difficult airways.  Can J Anaesth. 2004;  51 641-642
• 12 Lim T J, Lim Y, Liu E H. Evaluation of ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy.  Anaesthesia. 2005;  60 180-183
• 13 Falck A J, Escobedo M B, Baillargeon J G, Villard L G, Gunkel J H. Proficiency of pediatric residents in performing neonatal endotracheal intubation.  Pediatrics. 2003;  112 (6 Pt 1) 1242-1247
• 14 Leone T A, Rich W, Finer N N. Neonatal intubation: success of pediatric trainees.  J Pediatr. 2005;  146 638-641
• 15 O'Donnell C P, Kamlin C O, Davis P G, Morley C J. Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success rates, duration, and adverse effects.  Pediatrics. 2006;  117 e16-e21
• 16 Stroumpoulis K, Pagoulatou A, Violari M et al.. Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway: a comparison with the Macintosh blade.  Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;  26 218-222
• 17 Fiadjoe J E, Stricker P A, Hackell R S et al.. The efficacy of the Storz Miller 1 video laryngoscope in a simulated infant difficult intubation.  Anesth Analg. 2009;  108 1783-1786
• 18 Kattwinkel J. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. 4th ed. Elk Grove, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics/American Heart Association Neonatal Resuscitation Program; 2000
• 19 Lane B, Finer N, Rich W. Duration of intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation.  J Pediatr. 2004;  145 67-70
• 20 Trevisanuto D, Fornaro E, Verghese C. The GlideScope video laryngoscope: initial experience in five neonates.  Can J Anaesth. 2006;  53 423-424
• 21 Wald S H, Keyes M, Brown A. Pediatric video laryngoscope rescue for a difficult neonatal intubation.  Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;  18 790-792
• 22 Xue F S, Tian M, Liao X, Xu Y C. Safe and successful intubation using a Storz video laryngoscope in management of pediatric difficult airways.  Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;  18 1251-1252
• 23 White M, Weale N, Nolan J, Sale S, Bayley G. Comparison of the Cobalt Glidescope video laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscopy in simulated normal and difficult infant airways.  Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;  19 1108-1112
• 24 Kim J T, Na H S, Bae J Y et al.. GlideScope video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients.  Br J Anaesth. 2008;  101 531-534
• 25 Vanderhal A L, Berci G, Simmons Jr C F, Hagiike M. A videolaryngoscopy technique for the intubation of the newborn: preliminary report.  Pediatrics. 2009;  124 e339-e346
• 26 Garza A G, Gratton M C, Coontz D, Noble E, Ma O J. Effect of paramedic experience on orotracheal intubation success rates.  J Emerg Med. 2003;  25 251-256